Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Mental Double-Edge

“I sincerely hope he can bring that mental edge because he recognizes the situations that one top player is facing, especially during the Grand Slams and the pressures and expectations. That’s what we’re hoping to work on and improve the most. And, of course, a couple of other elements of my game.”
"Mental edge." "Mental" seems to be Novak Djokovic's go-to vocabulary word of 2014. How does a player who was, until very recently, ranked No. 1 in the world, expert vanquisher of match points against him, and six-time Grand Slam champion need someone with fewer career accomplishments than he help him with the game's mental approach?

During Novak's ascendence to the very top of the tennis world, he received criticism for many different things: his cocksure attitude, his brash confidence, and his annoyingly accurate impersonations left a bad taste in the many mouths of the sport's traditionalists. (I've always loved and appreciated his early behavior.) The abundance of loathing he garnered from the lovers of the Federer-Nadal rivalry was even further augmented by his ability to thwart their battles for ATP supremacy.


The singular on-court aspect of Novak that was easy to bash, however, was his lacking mental fortitude. For someone who talked a big game and backed it up quite often, Novak was horrible when the chips were down. King of Retirements and master of double-faulting break point down, his lack of fight that his contemporaries had, specifically Nadal and Andy Murray, was his Achilles' Heel throughout his Slam-less 2009 and 2010 seasons.


But that all changed, starting with his back-from-the-brink win against Roger Federer at the 2010 U.S. Open semifinals, saving two match points. His next intermediary achievement was leading Team Serbia to their first ever Davis Cup victory. Those two shows of determination catapulted him to one of the greatest seasons in tennis history. In 2011, he took home three Slams, five Masters titles, and achieved 41 consecutive victories and never looked back. He was 6-0 against Nadal on all surfaces (and all in finals) and once again was left for dead against Federer in the U.S. Open semis before saving two more match points, one of which was eradicated on one of the most memorable service returns ever struck.

As if that wasn't enough to prove his fortitude, he played an epic 2012 Australian Open final, Novak's seventh straight meeting against Nadal at that stage, and outlasted one of the games greatest ever competitors, both physically and mentally, in a nearly six-hour slugfest. He didn't sustain this extraordinarily high level of success throughout the remainder of 2012 and 2013, but who could? He was consistently in the mix late in majors and held the top spot of the rankings for over 100 weeks, a benchmark only the legends reach.

In 2013, Novak found himself losing a little more frequently, both on big and small stages. Mental lapses became a bit more commonplace, most infamously during his Roland Garros semifinal against Rafa when, up a break in the fifth set, he ran into the net, losing the point on an easy putaway. Game, set, match, and year to Rafael Nadal. Djokovic was unable to bring it against his rivals for the remainder of the Grand Slam season.

Okay, so Novak was slightly below his ridiculously high par. No big deal. He won a ton of nail-biters over the years, those things are bound to even out in a sport with such small margins. On top of that, he managed to salvage at least some of his 2013 with a blazing fall, winning every match, including two routine victories over Nadal, to close out the season. No need to panic, right?

Which brings us to the hire of new head coach Boris Becker, tennis legend and owner of the proprietary "mental edge" that Novak believes will help him in 2014. There were jokes and laughs and doubts about Becker's ability to coach at this level, but Novak had his reasons. Novak, the most complete player in the game, likes to improve and add new tricks and he believes Becker will teach him to be more aggressive on serve and in the forecourt, all while giving him that oft-cited "mental edge."

We saw Becker's influence on Novak's game at their first tournament together, the Australian Open. Then in the quarterfinals, while involved in another five-set overtime tussle with Stanislas Wawrinka, his abilities to close failed him in a big way. He went up a quick break in the fifth set only to immediately dump serve on four careless forehand errors. He failed to convert break points in the pivotal seventh game of the set. Most egregiously, he horrendously shanked an easy forehand volley down match point. The one part of Novak's game he was supposedly improving deserted him for one crucial moment.

That being said, I am not blaming Boris Becker. He didn't hit that sitter volley for Novak. I'm not blaming the tactical choice to serve-and-volley, either. Novak has been implementing serve-and-volley throughout many matches in 2013 and the play got him the result he wanted, until it got to the "volley" portion of the strategy. I'm more concerned with what was going on in Novak's brain while it was sending signals to his right arm and hand, lungs, and legs.

All of this talk about Novak trying to find the "mental edge" over his rivals got me wondering if there is an "edge" to find. The "mental edge" is something that comes to you. But it doesn't come in your dreams at night in a 'Eureka!' fashion. It doesn't come on the practice courts with a brand name coach at your helm. It comes right at the exact moment you need it to. It comes when you blast a backhand down the line to set up an easy crosscourt backhand winner against your chief rival at a tournament he won eight times in a row. It comes to you when your opponent comes to the net on a great approach only to be felled by your brilliant passing shot. It comes to you in a single gutsy forehand while emotionally vulnerable and down match point, with the Greatest Of All Time serving on the other side of the net.

Whatever "mental edge" Novak Djokovic is looking for, he may not find it in Boris Becker. It comes and goes, flitting between the guys at the top, and it takes experience before it finds you again. Rafa regained the "mental edge" on Novak after seven consecutive heartbreaking losses. Wawrinka may have found the elusive "mental edge" last summer in Flushing Meadows. At this moment, Novak is overthinking in his search for it. He needs to let the "mental edge" come to him. Boris Becker may yet be a great addition to his team, but if Novak thinks that Becker will provide the cure to his recent Grand Slam disappointments, he may find himself hunting for the "edge" in vain.

(Link: a great live analysis of Novak Djokovic vs. Stanislas Wawrinka by @juanjosetennis of The Changeover)

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Oi...

The Australian Open has just begun and I have no idea what will happen. Well, I have an idea, but it will likely mean very little come Day 14. Anyway, I can give you a 41% guarantee that the following WILL happen. Here are my picks for Champion and "Surprise Semifinalist":
  • Men's Champion: Novak Djokovic - He's coming in with a head of steam. I understand that an entire offseason has happened and that new coach Boris Becker can throw a small hitch in his game, but Nole has been the king of Melbourne Park for three years running. I can't foresee anyone bringing him down, especially with Nadal's semi-shaky Doha title run (and his ridiculously tough draw) and Andy Murray's limited match play since the U.S. Open.
  • Surprise Semifinalist: John Isner - Much like Novak, he's coming in with some momentum ahead of a solid title run in Auckland. He was fortunate enough to be in the quarter anchored by a rusty Murray and an erratic Federer. Big John's big serve should do a ton of damage and he should feel no pressure this year, having missed last year's Oz due to injury.
  • Women's Champion: Serena Williams - I'm not gonna bother rationalizing this pick. NEXT.
  • Surprise Semifinalist: Andrea Petkovic - She was drawn into the slightly unstable Sharapova quarter and she has a manageable path. She plays No. 32 seed Magdalena Rybarikova in the first round, but Magda is known to crap out in Slams. Petko could get JJ in the third round.
I'll stop myself here before I make myself look dumb. Looking forward to enjoying the Happy Slam and lots of coffee on weekday mornings. Sleep is for the weak. Or for the smart, whichever.

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Less is More in 2-0-1-4

It's a new year, a new tennis season, and a new slew of things that I want to complain about! This year, less is more. Here are a few things I would like to see less of to make tennis more enjoyable in 2014:
  1. Less injuries. They suck. One reason why the Australian Open was so lackluster in 2013 was Nadal's absence due to his health problems. Injuries and pull-outs are a part of tennis, but seeing less of them this year would be awesome.
  2. Less chair umpire involvement in matches. Looking at you Mohamed Lahyani.
  3. Less fan rowdiness. I'm all for cheering on your guy like heck, but when someone has been trying to serve for the last five minutes, just stfu. Please.
  4. Less piling on. Some of the media have a tendency to hop on the bash bandwagon rather quickly, whether it's directed at Victoria Azarenka or Sloane Stephens or Bernard Tomic or Donald Young, then change tact when that player achieves something to earn praise. A little more perspective, both ways, really makes a difference.
  5. Less blatantly pronouncing names wrong. Dear Greg Garber, it's Djo-ko-VITCH, not Djo-ko-VICK. Get yourself together. Sincerely, literally everyone remotely paying attention to tennis within the last six years.
  6. Fewer articles about Venus/Serena skipping Indian Wells. Their decision is final, stop harping on about it.
  7. Fewer complaints about grunting. Why that's stopping you from watching great tennis, I will never know.
  8. Less courteousness among the players. Give me all of the drama. Andy Murray agrees.
  9. Fewer television coverage issues. See ATP Miami final on CBS. Or only see up until it gets to a final-set tiebreaker, then search for a completely different means to the watch the conclusion of the match, with none of those means being related to CBS or Tennis Channel or Tennis TV. Yeah, it was THAT dumb.
  10. Less violating the net...
  11. Less surface homogenization. I just want Tsvetana Pironkova to make a Wimbledon final. Or, at the very least, fewer of the same names left standing at the end of each tournament year-round.
What do you want to see less of this season? Leave a comment and complain away. The Australian Open is just days away! Prepping myself for less sleep.

Saturday, January 4, 2014

Canadian Missile Crisis: Make or Break Time for Raonic

This December, I'm going to attempt to profile a few players to watch in advance of the 2014 season. Leave a comment on any of these postmortems if there is a player you think I overlooked!

Maybe it's maple leaf
Although he missed qualifying for the World Tour Finals in 2013, Milos Raonic did well to finish the year at No. 11. He's the youngest guy in the Top 20 and second youngest in the Top 50. So why does it seem like 2014 is a make or break season for the Pride of Canada (or something)? It's because his 2013 didn't really consist of anything special. There were a few highs, and a few lows, but he's been mostly stagnant in terms of big wins or impressive runs. Here's how his 2013 shook out:

The Good

Milos should really be able to take advantage of his improved ranking on the Australian hard courts. He had a really impressive Asian swing, winning the Bangkok title over Tomas Berdych and defending his finalist points in Tokyo (ultimately losing to the hot hand of Juan Martin Del Potro). His big fall left him with an outside shot of qualifying for London going into Bercy. Even with all of that, Milos's season will be most remembered for his run to his first Masters 1000 final in his backyard at the Rogers Cup in Montreal, winning some very tight matches to get there.

The Bad

Unfortunately for Raonic, he continues to flounder against the guys ranked above him. His 2013 record against the Top 10 was only 3-9, with two of those victories coming after the U.S. Open and one of them muddled by controversy (more on that later). His Grand Slam performances have also been a disappointment. He failed to reach the quarterfinals of a single Slam this year and had his opportunity in Flushing Meadows against everyone's favorite Round of 16 opponent, Richard Gasquet. Milos had a match point in the very long fourth set tiebreaker, but couldn't close.

The Ugly

Milos really took unexpected heat when he hypothetically/technically gamed the system at the expense of beloved DelPo en route to the Rogers Cup final. Granted, Milos was on his way to winning that match and he did well to eventually apologize, but it wasn't a good look for him or for tennis. Raonic's desire to win matches is very evident, but it makes me wonder whether this helps or hurts him during pressure points. For someone who is prone to playing tiebreakers, he had a very mediocre 20-19 record last season.

2014 Outlook

I'm not sure what this new season will bring for Milos. His improved ranking should help him get slightly softer draws at Slams, but he's lost to lower ranked players in the past, and in rather routine fashion. We'll see if he can do some damage on the hard courts, especially in North America. Events outside of his home continent may be tough on Milos. He hasn't done a whole lot on clay and he's useless on grass. If he is to make a big move up to the upper crust of the rankings, Raonic better take advantage of the Melbourne, Indian Wells, and Miami hard courts. Who knows if he will, eh? (Had to.)

Agree? Disagree? Leave a comment!